neosloc archive

Repositories /

sirmmo/aiproxy

https://github.com/sirmmo/aiproxy · commit b002c6eb98f4 · evaluated 2026-10-07 with neosloc 0.8.0 · JSON

1.56 integrability index over 9 applicable dimensions
service surfaces · uses credentials
$58k → $13k classic COCOMO → neosloc value (23% survives)
buy make / buy = 2.14 over 3 years

Dimensions

Interface surface 3 solid A contract covers its transport: an HTTP contract covers at least 80% of declared routes (generated contracts do), or the application layer over a standard protocol (commands, topics, payloads) is specified in a protocol document or AsyncAPI.

Can another program use it through a documented, machine-readable surface?

  • next: L4 A second surface: another transport (HTTP and a protocol, two protocols), an MCP server, a CLI with JSON output, or an SDK. (only one programmatic surface)

service ladder · level 3

  • ✓ L1 A network surface exists: HTTP routes, an MCP server, or a standard protocol listener. app/routes/admin.py fastapi/flask: 15 route declarations
  • ✓ L2 A contract exists: a checked-in OpenAPI/GraphQL/protobuf/AsyncAPI spec, a framework-generated spec, MCP tool schemas, or a standard application protocol that off-the-shelf clients speak (RESP, MQTT, gRPC, PostgreSQL wire, …). app/main.py FastAPI (auto OpenAPI)
  • ✓ L3 A contract covers its transport: an HTTP contract covers at least 80% of declared routes (generated contracts do), or the application layer over a standard protocol (commands, topics, payloads) is specified in a protocol document or AsyncAPI. app/main.py generated from code: FastAPI (auto OpenAPI)
  • ✗ L4 A second surface: another transport (HTTP and a protocol, two protocols), an MCP server, a CLI with JSON output, or an SDK. only one programmatic surface
Contract stability 1 ad hoc Releases are versioned (semver tags or versioned changelog sections).

Can integrators rely on it not changing under them?

  • next: L2 A changelog exists and marks breaking changes. (no changelog)

all ladder · level 1

  • ✓ L1 Releases are versioned (semver tags or versioned changelog sections). 1 semver tags, latest v0.1.0
  • ✗ L2 A changelog exists and marks breaking changes. no changelog
  • ✓ L3 A deprecation mechanism is used in code (warnings, @deprecated, Deprecation/Sunset headers) or the API is versioned. app/routes/chat.py 2 matchesapp/main.py 1 match
  • ✗ L4 Across tagged releases, no OpenAPI operation, CLI option or __all__ symbol was removed without first being deprecated. fewer than two tagged releases to compare
Events 2 partial Webhooks sent by this system, or a streaming endpoint (SSE, WebSocket).

Can others react to state changes without polling?

  • next: L3 Signed webhooks registrable through the API, or two mechanisms (webhooks, streams, a broker). (one delivery mechanism, or webhooks that are unsigned or not registrable through the API)

service ladder · level 2

  • ✓ L1 Internal events exist (signals, queues, an outbox, emitters). app/routes/chat.py 1 match
  • ✓ L2 Webhooks sent by this system, or a streaming endpoint (SSE, WebSocket). app/routes/chat.py 1 match
  • ✗ L3 Signed webhooks registrable through the API, or two mechanisms (webhooks, streams, a broker). one delivery mechanism, or webhooks that are unsigned or not registrable through the API
  • ✗ L4 Events are described by AsyncAPI or CloudEvents. no AsyncAPI or CloudEvents contract
Identity 1 ad hoc Programmatic authentication (bearer tokens, API keys).

Can a machine act with its own revocable, least-privilege identity?

  • next: L2 Per-client, revocable credentials (managed API keys, service accounts) or OAuth2. (no managed keys or OAuth)

service ladder · level 1

  • ✓ L1 Programmatic authentication (bearer tokens, API keys). app/auth.py 1 matchapp/backends/anthropic_backend.py 1 match
  • ✗ L2 Per-client, revocable credentials (managed API keys, service accounts) or OAuth2. no managed keys or OAuth
  • ✗ L3 Credentials carry scopes or permissions. no scopes or permissions
  • ✗ L4 Standard provisioning or federation (OIDC client credentials, SCIM). no OIDC client credentials or SCIM
Data portability n/a Not applicable: owns no persistent data.

Can its data get in and out, in bulk, in open formats, with an explicit schema?

Agent ergonomics 1 ad hoc Errors are machine-readable: consistent JSON over HTTP, or a standard protocol's native error replies (RESP errors, MQTT reason codes, gRPC status, SQLSTATE).

Can an automated caller use it without guessing, and recover from failure?

  • next: L2 Field-level validation errors, and paginated lists. (no pagination)

service ladder · level 1

  • ✓ L1 Errors are machine-readable: consistent JSON over HTTP, or a standard protocol's native error replies (RESP errors, MQTT reason codes, gRPC status, SQLSTATE). app/routes/admin.py 12 matchesapp/routes/chat.py 8 matches
  • ✗ L2 Field-level validation errors, and paginated lists. no pagination
  • ✗ L3 Typed errors (RFC 9457 over HTTP, or a standard protocol's typed error codes), idempotent writes (Idempotency-Key), and rate-limit signals. no typed errors
  • ✗ L4 Dry-run or validate-only, conditional requests, and agent docs. no dry-run
Embeddability 4 exemplary Composition artifacts (compose, Helm, IaC).

Can another system run and compose it without a human?

service ladder · level 4

Extensibility 0 absent Not yet: Internal seams: a registry, registration function or plugin manager.

Can behaviour be added without modifying the code?

  • next: L1 Internal seams: a registry, registration function or plugin manager. (no registry or registration function)

all ladder · level 0

  • ✗ L1 Internal seams: a registry, registration function or plugin manager. no registry or registration function
  • ✗ L2 The docs show how to add behaviour through those seams (even in-tree). no registration functions to document
  • ✗ L3 Out-of-tree extensions are discovered (entry points, a plugin directory, configuration) without editing the package. extensions must be added inside the package
  • ✗ L4 The extension API is versioned, has lifecycle hooks, and has example extensions. the extension API isn't versioned
Observability 1 ad hoc A health or readiness endpoint, or a container healthcheck.

Can an operator, or an orchestrating agent, tell whether it works and why not?

  • next: L2 Structured logs. (no structured logging)

service ladder · level 1

  • ✓ L1 A health or readiness endpoint, or a container healthcheck. app/main.py 1 matchDockerfile 1 match
  • ✗ L2 Structured logs. no structured logging
  • ✗ L3 Metrics. no metrics
  • ✗ L4 Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry). no tracing
Change legibility 1 ad hoc A README and some tests.

Can an agent change it safely with limited context?

  • next: L2 CI runs the tests; applications pin dependencies (libraries and zero-dependency projects are exempt). (no lockfile (applications should pin dependencies))

all ladder · level 1

  • ✓ L1 A README and some tests. README.mdscripts/smoke_test.py 2 test files
  • ✗ L2 CI runs the tests; applications pin dependencies (libraries and zero-dependency projects are exempt). no lockfile (applications should pin dependencies)
  • ✗ L3 At least 90% of modules fit 32k tokens and no file exceeds 12k; test/source token ratio at least 0.3; at least 70% of the code is typed. test/source token ratio 0.21 < 0.3
  • ✗ L4 No import cycles, and agent docs (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, llms.txt). no agent docs (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, llms.txt)

Make or buy

Make with agents

105,780 output + 2,644,500 input tokens on anthropic:claude-opus-5-5 ≈ $4.

1.2 agent-hours · 2.2 human days (1.2 steering + 1.1 rediscovering history).

$1,754 over 3 years

Buy (adopt as is)

5 min to running (via service) + 10 min to first use (via service).

240 min/year of upgrades; price $0/year.

$821 over 3 years

Buying wins below $311 per year. How this is estimated.

Classic COCOMO vs neosloc value

Classic COCOMO (sloccount)

2.07 KSLOC → 5.1 person-months over 4.7 months.

$58k

The effort to write it by hand, as COCOMO priced it in 1981.

neosloc value (neoCOCOMO)

Reproduce with agents: 1.3 PM (×0.26 of classic; 65% of behaviour captured by tests, contract and docs).

Rediscover uncaptured history: 0.1 PM (2 fixes in 20 commits by 1 authors).

× leverage 0.94 (integrability) × obsolescence 0.9.

$13k (1.2 PM)

What survives

23% of the classic figure

4% of the replacement cost lives only in code and history.

How the value is estimated.

History

2026-10-07: 1.562026-10-07: 1.562026-10-07: 1.562026-10-07: 1.562026-10-07: 1.56
EvaluatedCommitneoslocIndexMake or buy
2026-10-07b002c6eb98f40.8.01.56buy
2026-10-07b002c6eb98f40.7.41.56buy
2026-10-07b002c6eb98f40.7.31.56buy
2026-10-07b002c6eb98f40.7.21.56buy
2026-10-07b002c6eb98f40.7.11.56buy