neosloc archive

Repositories /

charmbracelet/bubbletea

https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea · commit f9df43c4f2c0 · evaluated 2026-10-12 with neosloc 0.8.0 · JSON

1.29 integrability index over 7 applicable dimensions
library surfaces
$75k → $57k classic COCOMO → neosloc value (76% survives)
buy make / buy = 91.55 over 3 years

Dimensions

Interface surface 3 solid The public API is statically typed (py.typed, type declarations, a typed language).

Can another program use it through a documented, machine-readable surface?

  • next: L4 An API reference is generated from the code (autodoc, mkdocstrings, typedoc, …). (no generated API reference)

library ladder · level 3

  • ✓ L1 An importable, packaged API exists. go.mod Go module with exported packages
  • ✓ L2 The public API is delimited (__all__, an exports map, exported identifiers). go.mod exported identifiers
  • ✓ L3 The public API is statically typed (py.typed, type declarations, a typed language). go.mod statically typed language
  • ✗ L4 An API reference is generated from the code (autodoc, mkdocstrings, typedoc, …). no generated API reference
Contract stability 1 ad hoc Releases are versioned (semver tags or versioned changelog sections).

Can integrators rely on it not changing under them?

  • next: L2 A changelog exists and marks breaking changes. (no changelog)

all ladder · level 1

  • ✓ L1 Releases are versioned (semver tags or versioned changelog sections). 109 semver tags, latest v2.1.0
  • ✗ L2 A changelog exists and marks breaking changes. no changelog
  • ✗ L3 A deprecation mechanism is used in code (warnings, @deprecated, Deprecation/Sunset headers) or the API is versioned. no deprecation mechanism or API versioning
  • ✓ L4 Across tagged releases, no OpenAPI operation, CLI option or __all__ symbol was removed without first being deprecated. 20 tagged releases compared
Events n/a Not applicable: no service and no long-running CLI mode (batch CLIs, libraries and desktop apps have no events).

Can others react to state changes without polling?

Identity n/a Not applicable: uses no credentials and has no service surface.

Can a machine act with its own revocable, least-privilege identity?

Data portability n/a Not applicable: owns no persistent data.

Can its data get in and out, in bulk, in open formats, with an explicit schema?

Agent ergonomics 0 absent Not yet: Errors are specific exception types, and library code never calls sys.exit.

Can an automated caller use it without guessing, and recover from failure?

  • next: L1 Errors are specific exception types, and library code never calls sys.exit. (no exception classes)

library ladder · level 0

  • ✗ L1 Errors are specific exception types, and library code never calls sys.exit. no exception classes
  • ✗ L2 Inputs are validated with messages naming the bad argument. no input validation errors
  • ✗ L3 Timeouts and retries are configurable. no timeout parameter
  • ✗ L4 Agent docs, and examples that run as tests (doctests). no agent docs
Embeddability 3 solid Published to a public registry, with at most 10 runtime dependencies.

Can another system run and compose it without a human?

  • next: L4 Optional features behind extras/features. (no optional extras)

library ladder · level 3

  • ✓ L1 Importable from source. go.mod Go module with exported packages
  • ✓ L2 Installable as a package (a package manifest). go.mod package manifest
  • ✓ L3 Published to a public registry, with at most 10 runtime dependencies. .github/workflows/release.yml 5 matches unknown number of runtime dependencies
  • ✗ L4 Optional features behind extras/features. no optional extras
Extensibility 0 absent Not yet: Internal seams: a registry, registration function or plugin manager.

Can behaviour be added without modifying the code?

  • next: L1 Internal seams: a registry, registration function or plugin manager. (no registry or registration function)

all ladder · level 0

  • ✗ L1 Internal seams: a registry, registration function or plugin manager. no registry or registration function
  • ✗ L2 The docs show how to add behaviour through those seams (even in-tree). no registration functions to document
  • ✗ L3 Out-of-tree extensions are discovered (entry points, a plugin directory, configuration) without editing the package. extensions must be added inside the package
  • ✗ L4 The extension API is versioned, has lifecycle hooks, and has example extensions. the extension API isn't versioned
Observability 0 absent Not yet: Logs through a standard logger namespace and never prints from library code.

Can an operator, or an orchestrating agent, tell whether it works and why not?

  • next: L1 Logs through a standard logger namespace and never prints from library code. (no standard logger)

library ladder · level 0

  • ✗ L1 Logs through a standard logger namespace and never prints from library code. no standard logger
  • ✗ L2 Log levels are used meaningfully (at least two levels). fewer than two log levels used
  • ✗ L3 Optional metrics or tracing hooks. no metrics or tracing hooks
  • ✗ L4 OpenTelemetry instrumentation available. no OpenTelemetry instrumentation
Change legibility 2 partial CI runs the tests; applications pin dependencies (libraries and zero-dependency projects are exempt).

Can an agent change it safely with limited context?

  • next: L3 At least 90% of modules fit 32k tokens and no file exceeds 12k; test/source token ratio at least 0.3; at least 70% of the code is typed. (67% of modules fit 32k tokens; 0 files over 12k)

all ladder · level 2

  • ✓ L1 A README and some tests. README.mdcommands_test.go 11 test files
  • ✓ L2 CI runs the tests; applications pin dependencies (libraries and zero-dependency projects are exempt). .github/workflows/build.yml.github/workflows/coverage.yml
  • ✗ L3 At least 90% of modules fit 32k tokens and no file exceeds 12k; test/source token ratio at least 0.3; at least 70% of the code is typed. 67% of modules fit 32k tokens; 0 files over 12k
  • ✗ L4 No import cycles, and agent docs (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, llms.txt). no agent docs (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, llms.txt)

Make or buy

Make with agents

139,473 output + 3,486,825 input tokens on anthropic:claude-opus-5-5 ≈ $5.

1.6 agent-hours · 96.3 human days (1.4 steering + 94.9 rediscovering history).

$74,841 over 3 years

Buy (adopt as is)

2 min to running (via library) + 10 min to first use (via library).

240 min/year of upgrades; price $0/year.

$818 over 3 years

Buying wins below $24,675 per year. How this is estimated.

Classic COCOMO vs neosloc value

Classic COCOMO (sloccount)

2.64 KSLOC → 6.7 person-months over 5.1 months.

$75k

The effort to write it by hand, as COCOMO priced it in 1981.

neosloc value (neoCOCOMO)

Reproduce with agents: 1.4 PM (×0.2 of classic; 77% of behaviour captured by tests, contract and docs).

Rediscover uncaptured history: 4.5 PM (533 fixes in 1796 commits by 178 authors).

× leverage 0.91 (integrability) × obsolescence 0.95.

$57k (5.1 PM)

What survives

76% of the classic figure

77% of the replacement cost lives only in code and history.

How the value is estimated.

History

2026-10-07: 1.292026-10-07: 1.292026-10-07: 1.292026-10-07: 1.292026-10-12: 1.29
EvaluatedCommitneoslocIndexMake or buy
2026-10-12f9df43c4f2c00.8.01.29buy
2026-10-0796d69d2f7eb10.8.01.29buy
2026-10-0796d69d2f7eb10.7.41.29buy
2026-10-0796d69d2f7eb10.7.31.29buy
2026-10-0796d69d2f7eb10.7.21.29buy